- FMA
- The Fabricator
- FABTECH
- Canadian Metalworking
Canadian Automotive Content
In the battle of content versus unit production, content may be a better identifier of trends
- By Dennis DesRosiers
- July 1, 2010
- Article
- Management
Year
| North American Vehicle Production |
North American Assembly Content per Vehicle (US Dollars) |
North American Auto Parts Content per Vehicle (US Dollars) |
North American Content per Vehicle (US Dollars) |
Canadian Auto Parts Content per Vehicle (US Dollars) |
Canadian Auto Parts Content per Vehicle (Percent) |
Canadian Assembly Content per Vehicle (US Dollars) |
Canadian Assembly Content per Vehicle (Percent) |
Total Canadian Content per Vehicle (US Dollars) |
Total Canadian Content per Vehicle (Percent) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1997 |
16,055,542 |
$5,138 |
$12,085 |
$17,223 |
$1,085 |
9.0% |
$450 |
8.8% |
$1,535 |
8.9% |
1998 |
16,032,875 |
$4,667 |
$13,264 |
$17,931 |
$1,095 |
8.3% |
$474 |
10.2% |
$1,570 |
8.8% |
1999 |
17,616,121 |
$5,337 |
$14,136 |
$19,473 |
$1,140 |
8.1% |
$763 |
14.3% |
$1,903 |
9.8% |
2000 |
17,659,700 |
$4,448 |
$13,714 |
$18,162 |
$1,140 |
8.3% |
$743 |
16.7% |
$1,883 |
10.4% |
2001 |
15,816,654 |
$4,614 |
$14,103 |
$18,717 |
$1,167 |
8.3% |
$755 |
16.4% |
$1,921 |
10.3% |
2002 |
16,717,553 |
$5,544 |
$13,450 |
$18,994 |
$1,199 |
8.9% |
$812 |
14.6% |
$2,011 |
10.6% |
2003 |
16,215,337 |
$5,337 |
$15,456 |
$20,793 |
$1,383 |
8.9% |
$660 |
12.4% |
$2,043 |
9.8% |
2004 |
16,224,864 |
$5,025 |
$15,912 |
$20,937 |
$1,561 |
9.8% |
$644 |
12.8% |
$2,205 |
10.5% |
2005 |
16,315,783 |
$5,017 |
$16,285 |
$21,302 |
$1,604 |
9.8% |
$594 |
11.8% |
$2,198 |
10.3% |
2006 |
15,877,161 |
$5,053 |
$17,354 |
$22,407 |
$1,640 |
9.4% |
$557 |
11.0% |
$2,197 |
9.8% |
2007 |
15,426,345 |
$5,845 |
$17,452 |
$23,297 |
$1,705 |
9.8% |
$592 |
10.1% |
$2,297 |
9.9% |
2008 |
12,950,258 |
$5,872 |
$17,250 |
$23,122 |
$1,604 |
9.3% |
$576 |
9.8% |
$2,180 |
9.4% |
Change |
-16.1% |
0.5% |
-1.2% |
-0.8% |
-5.9% |
-2.7% |
-5.1% |
By looking at content rather than units of production we can actually evaluate the role of Canada in the North American automotive production process in a better way. Content can come from a number of sources, including labor, which is the biggest area; raw materials; and the profit generated from Canadian factories.
Content, though, is a concept that is not well-understood.
To begin, all content is generated at the manufacturing level and does not include any increase in the value of a vehicle created in the distribution and retail side of the industry. Many don't realize it, but the value of a vehicle at the factory gate is substantially lower than what a consumer pays at the retail level.
The average retail cost of a vehicle in 2008 was somewhere north of US$35,000, but at the factory gate, the average price of a vehicle was only US$23,122. This means that an additional US$10,000 is added to the price of a vehicle by the distributor and retailer of vehicles.
This money goes toward the cost of marketing, transportation, distributor and retailer profits, sales incentives, and the cost of selling the vehicle.
Content Explained
Most of the content is actually in the parts side of the business; the actual cost of the components in a vehicle.
In 2008 the parts content of a typical vehicle produced in North America was US$17,250. A very small part of this was Canadian content: The average vehicle produced in North America had only US$1,604 of Canadian OE parts content, or 9.3 percent of the total parts content.
This hasn’t changed much over the last 10 years. At the early part of the decade Canadian content was closer to 9 percent, grew to nearly 10 percent, and has fallen back to the current level. In other words, the parts sector in Canada has not been growing its presence in the North American production base and, indeed, has lost some of its position over the past few years. This should be a big concern of our friends in the government.
The assembly side of the sector is highly automated and accounts for only US$5,872 worth of content in a typical vehicle produced in North America. This amount is the average for both the new domestic producers and the Detroit Three.
Canadian assembly content per North American-produced vehicle in 2008 was only US$576, and no, that is not a typo. The Canadian assembly content in a Canadian-produced vehicle would be much higher, but when extrapolated across all vehicles made in North America, the value of assembly content drops dramatically.
Canada should also be quite concerned at our performance on assembly content this decade.
At its peak in 2000, Canada accounted for 16.7 percent of the assembly content of a vehicle produced in North America, but this has fallen to only 10.1 percent, another cause for concern.
Why? Well, Canada invited the Japanese into the country, and for the most part the Japanese make smaller, lower-value-added vehicles with lower-cost labor than the Detroit Three.
They also brought with them the most automated factories in the world, factories that were much more automated than any Detroit Three factory in this country. These factors keep their Canadian content low.
As Japanese production grew in Canada, our share of assembly content naturally declined. In addition, the Detroit Three didn't sit on their butts and do nothing. They also automated their Canadian factories and closed some of the facilities making vehicles with the highest assembly value added vehicles in North America.
Chrysler closed its full-size van plant in Windsor; Ford closed OTP in Oakville, which made pickup trucks; and GM is closing its pickup truck factory in Oshawa. So the Detroit Three also lowered their assembly content in Canada relative to the U.S. and Mexico, and relative to their historical performance in Canada.
We should be concerned about this. We have a tendency to become comfortable with our unit production performance. And on a unit performance basis, Canada is faring rather well.
At the end of October 2009 Canada was still producing 16.8 percent of vehicles built in North America. Total production was down radically, but Canadian companies have maintained their share of unit production.
However, if you look at the Canadian content in these vehicles, it is down significantly on the assembly side of the sector, and parts content is declining as well.
I recommend that our policy wonks start evaluating this decline with a better understanding of the whole issue of raising Canadian content. If we are able to do this, then the jobs will take care of themselves.
For more information, visit www.desrosiers.ca.
subscribe now
Keep up to date with the latest news, events, and technology for all things metal from our pair of monthly magazines written specifically for Canadian manufacturers!
Start Your Free Subscription- Stay connected from anywhere
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of Canadian Metalworking.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of Canadian Fabricating & Welding.
- Trending Articles
- Industry Events
MME Langely
- April 10, 2024
- Langely, BC Canada
Tube 2024
- April 15 - 19, 2024
- Düsseldorf, Germany
Lincoln Electric's Large Format 3D Metal Printing Seminar
- April 16 - 17, 2024
- Cleveland, OH
CTMA Economic Uncertainty: Helping You Navigate Windsor Seminar
- April 30, 2024
- Windsor, ON Canada
MME Winnipeg
- April 30, 2024
- Winnipeg, ON Canada